| Problem ID | A |
| Problem Name | Ключ |
| Tests | 1-26 |
| Time limit | 2 sec |
| Memory limit | 64 mb |
|
Test #
| Outcome | Comment | Score |
| 1 | OK | 31 | 2 of 2 |
| 2 | OK | 97 | 2 of 2 |
| 3 | OK | 36 | 2 of 2 |
| 4 | OK | 195 | 2 of 2 |
| 5 | OK | 699 | 2 of 2 |
| 6 | OK | 707 | 2 of 2 |
| 7 | OK | 905 | 2 of 2 |
| 8 | OK | 106 | 2 of 2 |
| 9 | OK | 124 | 2 of 2 |
| 10 | OK | -1 | 10 of 10 |
| 11 | OK | 249 | 10 of 10 |
| 12 | OK | 2499 | 4 of 4 |
| 13 | OK | 2499 | 4 of 4 |
| 14 | OK | 9983 | 4 of 4 |
| 15 | OK | 802 | 4 of 4 |
| 16 | WA | expected: "802", found: "-1" | 0 of 4 |
| 17 | WA | expected: "637", found: "-1" | 0 of 4 |
| 18 | WA | expected: "638", found: "-1" | 0 of 4 |
| 19 | WA | expected: "194", found: "38" | 0 of 4 |
| 20 | WA | expected: "299", found: "140" | 0 of 4 |
| 21 | WA | expected: "0", found: "-195" | 0 of 5 |
| 22 | WA | expected: "0", found: "-195" | 0 of 5 |
| 23 | WA | expected: "64", found: "137" | 0 of 4 |
| 24 | WA | expected: "6", found: "35" | 0 of 4 |
| 25 | WA | expected: "11", found: "210" | 0 of 4 |
| 26 | OK | 839 | 4 of 4 |
Points: 58 of 100
| Problem ID | B |
| Problem Name | Трактор |
| Tests | 1-22 |
| Time limit | 2 sec |
| Memory limit | 64 mb |
|
Test #
| Outcome | Comment | Score |
| 1 | OK | That's ok: 0.0905538513813742 0.0905538514 | 2 of 2 |
| 2 | WA | Too fast: 1.10124921972504 2 | 0 of 2 |
| 3 | WA | Not optimal: 4.44467119602973 2.222335598 | 0 of 2 |
| 4 | OK | That's ok: 0.170710678118655 0.1707106781 | 2 of 2 |
| 5 | WA | Not optimal: 2.23606797749979 2.1598758088 | 0 of 4 |
| 6 | WA | Not optimal: 150 144.1506350946 | 0 of 6 |
| 7 | WA | Not optimal: 20.8806130178211 15.1961524227 | 0 of 6 |
| 8 | WA | Not optimal: 392.756519904784 318.3973711051 | 0 of 6 |
| 9 | WA | Not optimal: 59.0735135234057 59.0021877343 | 0 of 6 |
| 10 | WA | Not optimal: 18.3847763108502 15.9803751657 | 0 of 3 |
| 11 | WA | Too fast: 7.33729704850731 8.8054692883 | 0 of 3 |
| 12 | WA | Not optimal: 5.65685424949238 5.3283173259 | 0 of 3 |
| 13 | WA | Not optimal: 4.24264068711929 4.2360679775 | 0 of 3 |
| 14 | WA | Not optimal: 225.19380542102 208.8344918646 | 0 of 6 |
| 15 | WA | Not optimal: 92.2821759604746 88.855757648 | 0 of 6 |
| 16 | WA | Not optimal: 439.455107193606 407.0247329899 | 0 of 6 |
| 17 | WA | Not optimal: 224.055796622181 206.9381477809 | 0 of 6 |
| 18 | WA | Not optimal: 53.9053081961586 49.7092346159 | 0 of 6 |
| 19 | WA | Not optimal: 7.60247352677641 7.6022787491 | 0 of 6 |
| 20 | WA | Not optimal: 79.6404353632291 53.5717331702 | 0 of 6 |
| 21 | WA | Not optimal: 117.568972897347 65.3624151095 | 0 of 6 |
| 22 | WA | Not optimal: 30 28.75 | 0 of 4 |
Points: 4 of 100
| Problem ID | C |
| Problem Name | Сеть для жюри |
| Tests | 1-40 |
| Time limit | 2 sec |
| Memory limit | 64 mb |
|
Test #
| Outcome | Comment | Score |
| 1 | OK | 0 hubs found | 2 of 2 |
| 2 | OK | 1 hubs found | 2 of 2 |
| 3 | WA | jury has better solution: 21.00000 vs 11.00000 | 0 of 2 |
| 4 | OK | -1 hubs found | 2 of 2 |
| 5 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 2 |
| 6 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 2 |
| 7 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 2 |
| 8 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 2 |
| 9 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 2 |
| 10 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 3 |
| 11 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 3 |
| 12 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 3 |
| 13 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 3 |
| 14 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 3 |
| 15 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 3 |
| 16 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 3 |
| 17 | WA | jury has better solution: 5142.00000 vs 3053.00000 | 0 of 3 |
| 18 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 3 |
| 19 | WA | jury has better solution: 9040.00000 vs 6589.00000 | 0 of 3 |
| 20 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 3 |
| 21 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 3 |
| 22 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 4 |
| 23 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 4 |
| 24 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 4 |
| 25 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 4 |
| 26 | OK | -1 hubs found | 2 of 2 |
| 27 | WA | jury has better solution: 24.00000 vs 13.00000 | 0 of 2 |
| 28 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 2 |
| 29 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 2 |
| 30 | OK | 0 hubs found | 2 of 2 |
| 31 | WA | jury has better solution: 170514.00000 vs 154890.00000 | 0 of 2 |
| 32 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 2 |
| 33 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 2 |
| 34 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 2 |
| 35 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 2 |
| 36 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 2 |
| 37 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 2 |
| 38 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 2 |
| 39 | WA | %s error: not simmetric connection between hubs, [user] | 0 of 2 |
| 40 | WA | jury has better solution: 752775.00000 vs 516710.00000 | 0 of 2 |
Points: 10 of 100